WNU Editor: The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists are saying no …. Experts know the new coronavirus is not a bioweapon. They disagree on whether it could have leaked from a research lab (Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists), and they are using this Nature article to validate their conclusion …. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 (Nature). But many are now pointing out errors in the Nature article, and the publications close relationship with China …. China owns Nature magazine’s ass – Debunking “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t from a lab (Harvard and the Big House). Adding to this debate are Chinese researchers themselves, starting with the Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology that made the conclusion in February that ‘the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan’ …. Did Coronavirus Originate In A Chinese Government Laboratory? (Daily Mail).
My prediction. This debate on China’s role in spreading this virus is only starting. And with China continuing to deny access to its Wuhan Center for Disease Control (WHCDC) to outside experts while this pandemic continues to claim thousands of lives each day, its role and demands for accountability will grow.
Update: I concur. The media has completely failed in covering this story …. Questioning coronavirus origins is not a conspiracy It’s up to the media to discover the truth, not accept answers at face value (Stephen L. Miller, Spectator).